This week Ethiopian government disclosed that a tributary to Abbay 
river (Blue Nile, which is part of the longest river in the world) is 
diverted (apparently only by about 0.2 km or 200 meters) for the ongoing
 construction of $ 4.7 billion worth of dam. The news renewed 
speculation on the prospect of peace /war between Egypt and Ethiopia.
The issue is given extensive media coverage in Egypt and elsewhere. The Washington Post
 reported that diplomats from Egypt and Ethiopia do not see conflict 
between Egypt and Ethiopia coming.  There is optimism on both sides that
 the project will not affect Egypt’s share of, based on previous 
agreements, the water.  However, The Egyptian Gazette  indicated that the assurance that the Egyptian president got, during his recent visit to Addis for the Africa Union 50th celebrations, from Hailemariam Desalegne is verbal.
Experts’ opinion expressed on the side of Egypt seem to have a 
different take on the issue and they think the project is sure to affect
 the water flow to Egypt. Some even went to the extent of condemning 
Ethiopia: “…It remains irresponsible for Ethiopia to build Africa’s 
biggest hydropower project, on its most contentious river, with no 
public access to critical information about the dam’s impacts…” (cited in WP)
More aggressive comment from people like Sheikh Abdel-Akher Hammad of
 Al-Gamaa Al-Islamiya suggests the possibility of war. It seems that the
 understanding on the part of Al-Gammaa Al-Islamiya is that the recent 
diversion of the tributary river is “a declaration of war on Egypt,” 
according to Ahram online.
While there seem to be unanimity among opinion leaders and experts in
 Egypt that the dam will affect the water quota of Egypt, the most 
moderate intended plan of action for some is, apparently, to push the 
government of Egypt to commit Ethiopia to sign another agreement to 
uphold previously agreed upon water quotas and even for the government 
Ethiopia to undertake the construction of the dam “under the supervision of Egyptian experts…”
 which is outrageous, to say the least.  In unrelated (?) turn of 
events, Egyptian firms seem to seek further business ground in Ethiopia –
 and that in gold mining.
 Probably it is a strategic move to strike another business deal from 
the reckless TPLF leadership and it is likely that Centamin, the mining 
company, might get it its way.
Strong opinion within Egypt regarding Nile appear to point to one 
direction: what looks like common understanding between Egyptian 
diplomats and their Ethiopian counterparts, and even the common 
understanding between president Morsi and Hailemariam Desalegne could be
 misleading. Probably, Morsi didn’t mean it when he said that the 
diversion and the construction does not affect Egypt’s share of the 
water and if he did, he is likely to change his position due to pressure
 from opinion leaders and other influential entities in the Egyptian 
society.
The controversial dam construction project emerged out of the blue in
 the middle of Tahrir revolution and for many it appeared that it was 
not meant to divert a river, rather as a distraction to rising political
 temperature in Ethiopia following the “Arab spring.” It may be so or 
maybe not. But, no question that people in Ethiopia did not have prior knowledge of the project before it was unveiled.
What is clear is that had Egypt not been in a situation of internal 
chaos, the response to mysterious dam project would have been different.
 The Thahrir revolution is followed by power struggle which is 
culminated by the victory of Muslim Brotherhoods. In fact, the outcome 
was determined in a legitimate election process.
After victory, Morsi’s supporters rallied for “all power to Morsi” 
(“all power to the soviets” in the Great October Russian Revolution 
comes to mine) which caused another tension within Egypt.
The problem in Syria is apparently dividing the world. Despite 
previous difference, European Union (The US will likely join it) 
resolved to lift what it termed us arms ban on the rebels. On the other 
hand, the Syrian government announced that it is receiving missile from 
Russia. Hezbolla is committed to help the Syrian government. Israel is 
has its own feud with Syria. So the region is evolving into a major war 
causing situation. In light of that and its internal problem, Egypt 
might not be in a position to take an aggressive move against Ethiopia. 
But that does not mean, Egypt will not have a desire to at some point.
If the 4.7 million worth dam construction is to cause an even more 
expensive war –both in terms of finance and human lives- there relevance
 of the project fades into darkness, which is totally undesirable. More 
worrisome is that if a conflict over this project erupts it will not be 
limited to “water war” and may spill over other areas and involve other 
societies and countries. That is not desirable too.
No question Ethiopia should get its fair share of water from its own 
river. Yet, Ethiopia should pursue its interest cautiously. Ethiopia 
does not have to enter to war with Egypt. Ethiopia does not have to 
enter into other forms of appeasement deals that harms the interest of 
Ethiopia in the long term too.
Had there been intensive public discussion before the ruling TPLF 
party unilaterally unveils the dam project as a means to divert 
political tension, probably it would have been possible to come up with a
 more useful, less controversial and much cheaper project. Now, it is 
late. So the Ethiopian government should engage the authorities in Egypt
 and build confidence that Ethiopia will not be using (it should not of 
course) more than its share of the water. The “development” effort on 
the part of Ethiopia should not, by any means, turn out to be war. If it
 happens, it will not be like any other wars. It will drain Ethiopia’s 
resources and creates another layer of long term problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment