Politicians meeting with Egypt’s
president proposed hostile acts against Ethiopia to stop it from
building a massive dam on the Nile River upstream. Some didn’t seem to
know they were on live TV at the time.
CAIRO—Politicians
meeting with Egypt’s president on Monday proposed hostile acts against
Ethiopia, including backing rebels and carrying out sabotage, to stop it
from building a massive dam on the Nile River upstream.
Some of the
politicians appeared unaware the meeting with President Mohammed Morsi
was being carried live on TV. Morsi did not directly react to the
suggestions, but said in concluding remarks that Egypt respects Ethiopia
and its people and will not engage in any aggressive acts against the
East African nation.
Morsi called the
meeting to review the impact of Ethiopia’s $4.2 billion hydroelectric
dam, which would be Africa’s largest. Egypt in the past has threatened
to go to war over its “historic rights” to Nile River water.
Morsi’s office later
said he had directed his foreign and irrigation ministers to maintain
contact with the Ethiopian government to obtain more information on the
dam and its likely impact on Egypt’s share of the Nile water.
His office’s statement
included an ominous-sounding note, saying: “Egypt will never surrender
its right to Nile water and all options (to safeguard it) are being
considered.”
Ethiopia last week
started diverting the flow of the Nile to make way for its hydroelectric
plant dubbed the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. On completion, it is
expected to produce 6,000 megawatts, and its reservoir is scheduled to
start filling next year.
An independent panel
of experts has concluded that the dam will not significantly affect
downstream Sudan and Egypt, which are highly dependent on the water of
the world’s longest river, said an Ethiopian official, who spoke
Saturday on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to
speak publicly on the topic.
But in Cairo on
Monday, Younis Makhyoun, leader of an ultraconservative Islamist party,
said Egypt should back rebels in Ethiopia or, as a last resort, destroy
the dam. He said Egypt made a “strategic error” when it did not object
to the dam’s construction.
Makhyoun said Ethiopia
is “fragile” because of rebel movements inside the country. “We can
communicate with them and use them as a bargaining chip against the
Ethiopian government,” he said. “If all this fails, then there is no
choice left for Egypt but to play the final card, which is using the intelligence service to destroy the dam.”
Another politician,
liberal Ayman Nour, proposed spreading rumours about Egypt obtaining
refuelling aircraft to create the impression that it plans an airstrike
to destroy the dam.
“This could yield results on the diplomatic track,” Nour said.
Magdy
Hussein, another Islamist politician, warned that talk of military
action against Ethiopia is “very dangerous” and will only turn
Ethiopians into enemies. He suggested soft diplomacy in dealing with the
crisis, including organizing a film festival in Ethiopia and
dispatching researchers and translation missions.
Ethiopia’s decision to construct the dam challenges a colonial-era agreement that gave
Egypt and Sudan rights to the Nile water. That agreement, first signed
in 1929, took no account of the eight other nations along the
6,700-kilometre river and its basin, which have been agitating for a
decade for a more equitable accord.
Ethiopian Minister of Water and Energy Alemayehu Tegenu has said Egypt should not worry about a diminished water share.
“We don’t have any
irrigation projects around the dam. The dam is solely intended for
electricity production . . . So there should not be any concerns about a
diminished water flow,” Alemayehu told The Associated Press on
Saturday.
Eighty-five per cent
of Nile waters originate in Ethiopia, yet the nation utilizes very
little of them, and the country has become synonymous with famine.
No comments:
Post a Comment